Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur Radiol. 2019 Mar 11. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06061-7. [Epub ahead of print]

Exploring quantitative group-wise differentiation of Alzheimer's disease and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia using tract-specific microstructural white matter and functional connectivity measures at multiple time points.

Author information

1
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
2
Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
3
Research Center for Motor Control and Neuroplasticity, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
4
Functional Neuroimaging Laboratory, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital Foundation, Lido, Italy.
5
Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam - Departments of Medical Informatics and Radiology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
6
Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
7
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. marion.smits@erasmusmc.nl.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

This study explored group-wise quantitative measures of tract-specific white matter (WM) microstructure and functional default mode network (DMN) connectivity to establish an initial indication of their clinical applicability for early-stage and follow-up differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD).

METHODS:

Eleven AD and 12 bvFTD early-stage patients and 18 controls underwent diffusion tensor imaging and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. All AD and 6 bvFTD patients underwent the same protocol at 1-year follow-up. Functional connectivity measures of DMN and WM tract-specific diffusivity measures were determined for all groups. Exploratory analyses were performed to compare all measures between the three groups at baseline and between patients at follow-up. Additionally, the difference between baseline and follow-up diffusivity measures in AD and bvFTD patients was compared.

RESULTS:

Functional connectivity of the DMN was not different between groups at baseline and at follow-up. Diffusion abnormalities were observed widely in bvFTD and regionally in the hippocampal cingulum in AD. The extent of the differences between bvFTD and AD was diminished at follow-up, yet abnormalities were still more pronounced in bvFTD. The rate of change was similar in bvFTD and AD.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study provides a tentative indication that quantitative tract-specific microstructural WM abnormalities, but not quantitative functional connectivity of the DMN, may aid early-stage and follow-up differential diagnosis of bvFTD and AD. Specifically, pronounced microstructural changes in anterior WM tracts may characterise bvFTD, whereas microstructural abnormalities of the hippocampal cingulum may characterise AD.

KEY POINTS:

• The clinical applicability of quantitative brain imaging measures for early-stage and follow-up differential diagnosis of dementia subtypes was explored using a group-wise approach. • Quantitative tract-specific microstructural white matter abnormalities, but not quantitative functional connectivity of the default mode network, may aid early-stage and follow-up differential diagnosis of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. • Pronounced microstructural white matter (WM) changes in anterior WM tracts characterise behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, whereas microstructural WM abnormalities of the hippocampal cingulum in the absence of other WM changes characterise Alzheimer's disease.

KEYWORDS:

Alzheimer disease; Diffusion tensor imaging; Frontotemporal dementia; Functional MRI; Longitudinal studies

PMID:
30859283
DOI:
10.1007/s00330-019-06061-7

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center