Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PeerJ. 2019 Feb 25;7:e6471. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6471. eCollection 2019.

A simulation framework for evaluating multi-stage sampling designs in populations with spatially structured traits.

Author information

1
College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
2
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Baleares, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
3
Applied Mathematics, Baskin School of Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate and efficient sampling strategy in biological surveys is a major concern in ecological research, particularly when the population abundance and individual traits of the sampled population are highly structured over space. Multi-stage sampling designs typically present sampling sites as primary units. However, to collect trait data, such as age or maturity, only a sub-sample of individuals collected in the sampling site is retained. Therefore, not only the sampling design, but also the sub-sampling strategy can have a major impact on important population estimates, commonly used as reference points for management and conservation. We developed a simulation framework to evaluate sub-sampling strategies from multi-stage biological surveys. Specifically, we compare quantitatively precision and bias of the population estimates obtained using two common but contrasting sub-sampling strategies: the random and the stratified designs. The sub-sampling strategy evaluation was applied to age data collection of a virtual fish population that has the same statistical and biological characteristics of the Eastern Bering Sea population of Pacific cod. The simulation scheme allowed us to incorporate contributions of several sources of error and to analyze the sensitivity of the different strategies in the population estimates. We found that, on average across all scenarios tested, the main differences between sub-sampling designs arise from the inability of the stratified design to reproduce spatial patterns of the individual traits. However, differences between the sub-sampling strategies in other population estimates may be small, particularly when large sub-sample sizes are used. On isolated scenarios (representative of specific environmental or demographic conditions), the random sub-sampling provided better precision in all population estimates analyzed. The sensitivity analysis revealed the important contribution of spatial autocorrelation in the error of population trait estimates, regardless of the sub-sampling design. This framework will be a useful tool for monitoring and assessment of natural populations with spatially structured traits in multi-stage sampling designs.

KEYWORDS:

Life history traits; Multi-stage sampling; Population ecology; Sampling design; Spatial ecology

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PeerJ, Inc. Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center