A Study of MnO2 with Different Crystalline Forms for Pseudocapacitive Desalination

ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019 Apr 10;11(14):13176-13184. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b20880. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

Abstract

Recent research on materials for capacitive deionization (CDI) has shown that intercalation materials have salt removal capacities (>40 mg g-1) much higher than those of carbon materials (∼15 mg g-1). However, little work has been done to elucidate the relationship between the microstructure of an intercalation material and its desalination performance. Herein, we report the desalination performances of various crystalline forms of MnO2 in a hybrid CDI setup without the use of ion-exchange membranes. MnO2 materials used in our experiments were either poorly crystalline or crystalline forms of 1D hollandite α-MnO2, 2D birnessite δ-MnO2, and 3D spinel λ-MnO2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy performed on electrochemically cycled MnO2 showed redox changes associated with intercalation processes in crystalline MnO2, whereas poorly crystalline MnO2 showed no such changes. It was further shown that surface adsorption is dominant in poorly crystalline MnO2 and that poorly crystalline forms of α-MnO2 and δ-MnO2 exhibited the highest salt removal capacities of 0.17 and 0.16 mmol g-1 (9.93 and 9.35 mg g-1), respectively. These performances are comparable to state-of-the-art carbon materials and are remarkable considering the low surface areas (<400 m2 g-1) of MnO2 materials.

Keywords: MnO2; birnessite; capacitive desalination; desalination; hollandite; spinel.