Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Nature. 2019 Feb;566(7742):58-64. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0901-4. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

Revisiting Antarctic ice loss due to marine ice-cliff instability.

Author information

1
Department of Geography, King's College London, London, UK. tamsin.edwards@kcl.ac.uk.
2
School of Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
3
Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, IGE, Grenoble, France.
4
Antarctic Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
5
GNS Science, Avalon, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
6
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, College Park, MD, USA.
7
Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Abstract

Predictions for sea-level rise this century due to melt from Antarctica range from zero to more than one metre. The highest predictions are driven by the controversial marine ice-cliff instability (MICI) hypothesis, which assumes that coastal ice cliffs can rapidly collapse after ice shelves disintegrate, as a result of surface and sub-shelf melting caused by global warming. But MICI has not been observed in the modern era and it remains unclear whether it is required to reproduce sea-level variations in the geological past. Here we quantify ice-sheet modelling uncertainties for the original MICI study and show that the probability distributions are skewed towards lower values (under very high greenhouse gas concentrations, the most likely value is 45 centimetres). However, MICI is not required to reproduce sea-level changes due to Antarctic ice loss in the mid-Pliocene epoch, the last interglacial period or 1992-2017; without it we find that the projections agree with previous studies (all 95th percentiles are less than 43 centimetres). We conclude that previous interpretations of these MICI projections over-estimate sea-level rise this century; because the MICI hypothesis is not well constrained, confidence in projections with MICI would require a greater range of observationally constrained models of ice-shelf vulnerability and ice-cliff collapse.

PMID:
30728522
DOI:
10.1038/s41586-019-0901-4

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group
Loading ...
Support Center