Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan 30. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001891. [Epub ahead of print]

Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Versus Reflective Debriefing for Pediatric Septic Shock Training.

Author information

1
Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
2
Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Rapid cycle deliberate practice is a simulation training method that cycles between deliberate practice and directed feedback to create perfect practice; in contrast to reflective debriefing where learners are asked to reflect on their performance to create change. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of rapid cycle deliberate practice versus reflective debriefing training on resident application and retention of the pediatric sepsis algorithm.

DESIGN:

Prospective, randomized-control study.

SETTING:

A tertiary care university children's hospital simulation room, featuring a high-fidelity pediatric patient simulator.

SUBJECTS:

Forty-six upper-level pediatric residents.

INTERVENTIONS:

Simulation training using rapid cycle deliberate practice or reflective debriefing.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:

Knowledge was assessed with a quiz on core sepsis management topics. The application of knowledge was assessed with a sepsis management checklist during the simulated scenario. The residents were assessed before and after the intervention and again at a follow-up session, 3-4 months later, to evaluate retention. Both groups had similar pre-intervention scores. Post-intervention, the rapid cycle deliberate practice group had higher checklist scores (rapid cycle deliberate practice 18 points [interquartile range, 18-19] vs reflective debriefing 17 points [interquartile range, 15-18]; p < 0.001). Both groups had improved quiz scores. At follow-up, both groups continued to have higher scores compared with the pre-intervention evaluation, with the rapid cycle deliberate practice group having a greater change in checklist score from pre-intervention to follow-up (rapid cycle deliberate practice 5 points [interquartile range, 3.5-7] vs reflective debriefing 3 points [interquartile range, 1.5-4.5]; p = 0.019). Both groups reported improved confidence in diagnosing and managing septic shock.

CONCLUSIONS:

Both rapid cycle deliberate practice and reflective debriefing are effective in training pediatric residents to apply the sepsis algorithm and in improving their confidence in the management of septic shock. The rapid cycle deliberate practice method was superior immediately post-training; however, it is unclear if this advantage is maintained over time. Both methods should be considered for training residents.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center