Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Maturitas. 2019 Mar;121:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 7.

Cognitive frailty: A conceptual systematic review and an operational proposal for future research.

Author information

1
Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Electronic address: david.facal@usc.es.
2
Universidade da Coruña, Gerontology Research Group, Instituto de Investigación biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), SERGAS, A Coruña, Spain.
3
Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
4
Department of Psychiatry, Radiologist, Public Health, Nursery and Medicine. Faculty of Nursery, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
5
Programa de Mayores, Fundación Bancaria La Caixa, Spain; Socio-Behavioral Section, International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics for the European Region, Spain.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To analyze the definition of "cognitive frailty" and to study the conceptual and operational definitions used and their implications for empirical research. The relationships between this concept and cognitive reserve, the role of neuropathology and brain reserve, motor signs of aging and the reversibility of cognitive frailty are also discussed.

STUDY DESIGN:

Systematic review of empirical studies identified from Medline Advanced 1966, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus until August 2017.

MAIN - OUTCOME MEASURES:

Effect sizes. The quality of the articles was assessed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Statement. Three independent reviewers participated in the study selection and data extraction.

RESULTS:

Nineteen studies involving 31,707 participants met the inclusion criteria. Significant associations were reported between cognitive frailty and physical frailty or gait speed. Screening instruments were usually used to determine objective cognitive decline rather than extensive neuropsychological assessments. Educational level was the only indicator of cognitive reserve that was systematically included in the evaluation of cognitive frailty. Motor decline and gait variables were not systematically included in protocols for the assessment of cognitive frailty.

CONCLUSIONS:

A strong operational definition would benefit both the development of treatments to counter cognitive frailty and the assessment of treatment effectiveness. Nevertheless, since there is clear agreement regarding the importance of interventions for and the prevention of cognitive frailty, randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of preventive interventions are necessary.

KEYWORDS:

Cognitive aging; Cognitive frailty; Cognitive impairment; Cognitive reserve; Physical frailty

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center