Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:171-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

The Utilization of Video Technology in Surgical Education: A Systematic Review.

Author information

1
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: jlg71@duke.edu.
2
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
3
Duke University Medical Center Library, Durham, North Carolina.
4
Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
5
Pediatric Plastic & Craniofacial Surgery, Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The use of surgical video has great potential to enhance surgical education, but there exists limited information about how to effectively use surgical videos. We performed a systematic review of video technology in surgical training and provided evidence-based recommendations for its effective use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A systematic review of literature on surgical video in residency education was conducted. All articles meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated for technical characteristics pertaining to video usage. Included studies were critically appraised using a quality-scoring system. Recommendations were provided for the effective implementation of video in surgical education based on associations with improved training outcomes.

RESULTS:

Twenty articles met inclusion criteria. In these studies, the source of video acquisition was primarily laparoscopy (40.0% of papers), and the main perspective of video was endoscopy (45.0%). Features of videos included supplementation with other educational tools (55.0%), schematic diagrams or images (50.0%), audio (40.0%), and narration (25.0%). Videos were primarily viewed preoperatively (60.0%) or postoperatively (50.0%). The intended viewer for videos was usually residents (70.0%) but also included attendings/faculty (30.0%). When compared with a nonvideo training group, video training was associated with improved resident knowledge (100%), improved operative performance (81.3%), and greater participant satisfaction (100%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Based on this review, we recommend that surgical training programs incorporate schematics and imaging into video, supplement video with other education tools, and utilize audio in video. For video review, we recommend that residents review video preoperatively and postoperatively for learning and that attendings review video postoperatively for assessment.

KEYWORDS:

Education; Residency; Surgery; Systematic review; Video

PMID:
30691792
DOI:
10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.015
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center