Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Neurol Sci. 2019 Mar 15;398:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.12.020. Epub 2018 Dec 22.

The King-Devick test in an outpatient concussion clinic: Assessing the diagnostic and prognostic value of a vision test in conjunction with exercise testing among acutely concussed adolescents.

Author information

1
Department of Neuroscience, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States. Electronic address: jblawren@buffalo.edu.
2
Department of Neuroscience, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States; UBMD Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States.
3
UBMD Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States.
4
Department of Biostatistics, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States.
5
Department of Psychiatry, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

This study investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of the King-Devick (K-D) test in conjunction with treadmill testing in adolescents after sport-related concussion (SRC) in an outpatient concussion management clinic without baseline measures.

DESIGN:

Prospective cohort.

METHODS:

The K-D test was administered pre- and post-exercise on a graded treadmill test to acutely concussed (AC, <10 days from injury, n = 46, 15.4 ± 2.1 years) participants for 2 clinic visits (1 week apart) and to matched controls (MC, n = 30, 15.8 ± 1.4 years) for 2 visits (1 week apart). Initial K-D test times were compared between MC and AC. Changes in times from pre- to post- exercise during a treadmill test were compared for MC and AC and from Visit 1 to Visit 2. Smooth pursuits and repetitive saccades were compared with initial visit K-D test performance.

RESULTS:

Comparison of pre-exercise K-D test times at Visit 1 distinguished MC from AC (46.1 ± 9.2 s vs. 53.7 ± 13.0 s, p = .007). Comparison of pre- and post-exercise K-D test times revealed significant improvements for MC (46.1 ± 9.2 s vs. 43.1 ± 8.5 s, p < .001) and AC who recovered by Visit 2 (Fast Recovery Group [FRG], n = 23, 50.4 ± 10.0 s vs. 47.3 ± 9.8 s, p = .002). No significant difference was seen in pre- and post-exercise K-D test times on Visit 1 for AC who took longer than 2 weeks to recover (Slow Recovery Group [SRG], n = 23, 57.0 ± 15.0 s vs. 56.0 ± 16.3 s, p = .478). At Visit 1, AC had more abnormal smooth pursuits than MC (17% vs. 3%, non-significant, p = .064). AC, however, had significantly more abnormal repetitive saccades than MC (37% vs. 3%, p = .001) and AC with abnormal repetitive saccades took significantly longer to complete the Visit 1 pre-exercise K-D test than AC with normal repetitive saccades (58.6 ± 16.0 s vs 50.8 ± 10.2 s, p = .049).

CONCLUSION:

The study supports utility of the K-D test as part of outpatient concussion assessment. Lack of improvement in K-D test performance after an exercise test may be an indicator of delayed recovery from SRC.

KEYWORDS:

Concussion; King-Devick test; Persistent post-concussion syndrome; Sideline assessment; Sport-related concussion

PMID:
30690413
DOI:
10.1016/j.jns.2018.12.020

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center