Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;73(2):150-156. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

Intravenous Fluid for the Treatment of Emergency Department Patients With Migraine Headache: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Author information

1
Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ. Electronic address: jones-christopher@cooperhealth.edu.
2
Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ.
3
Cooper Research Institute, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ.
4
TRYUMPH Research Program, Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility and necessity of performing a large-scale trial to measure the effect of intravenous fluid therapy on migraine headache pain.

METHODS:

This was a single-center, pilot randomized controlled trial. We randomized adult emergency department migraine headache patients to receive 1 L of normal saline solution during 1 hour (fluid group) or saline solution at 10 mL/hour for 1 hour (control group). All patients received intravenous prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine at the start of fluid administration. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded; nurses administering the intervention were not. Outcomes were assessed at 60 and 120 minutes, and 48 hours. The primary outcome was the difference in the verbal pain rating (on a scale of 0 to 10) between 0 and 60 minutes. Key secondary outcomes included additional clinical endpoints, the rate of protocol completion, and the effectiveness of blinding.

RESULTS:

Fifty patients consented to participate; one withdrew, leaving 25 patients randomized to the fluid group and 24 in the no fluid group. The mean improvement in 0- to 60-minute pain score was 4.5 (95% confidence interval 3.7 to 5.3) in the fluid group and 4.9 (95% confidence interval 3.5 to 6.2) in the control group. Primary outcome data were collected for 49 of 50 enrolled patients, and only one participant correctly identified the group assignment.

CONCLUSION:

This pilot study showed no statistically significant treatment effect from fluid administration, but does not exclude the possibility of a clinically important treatment effect. The study protocol and approach to blinding are both feasible and effective.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center