Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Zoonoses Public Health. 2019 Jan 21. doi: 10.1111/zph.12560. [Epub ahead of print]

Estimating direct healthcare costs attributable to laboratory-confirmed Lyme disease in Ontario, Canada: A population-based matched cohort study using health administrative data.

Author information

1
Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
3
Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
4
Public Health Ontario Laboratory, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
5
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
6
University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine healthcare costs attributable to laboratory-confirmed Lyme disease (LD) from the healthcare payer perspective in Ontario, Canada. A cost-of-illness study was conducted for incident LD subjects from 1 January 2006 through 31 December 2013 ascertained from provincial laboratory and reportable disease databases, linked to health administrative data. All LD subjects included were laboratory-confirmed, according to provincial case definitions. Incident LD subjects were propensity-score matched to uninfected subjects on age, sex, comorbidities and urban/rural status. We used phase-of-care methods to calculate attributable costs for two phases of illness: initial care (≤30 days following "index date") and continuing care (>30 days after index date to the end of the follow-up period). A total of 663 incident, confirmed LD subjects were identified from 2006 through 2013. Mean age was 44.2 ± 20.1 years; 339 (51.1%) were female; and 31 (4.7%) were hospitalized ≤30 days after index date. Six hundred fifty-eight (99.2%) LD subjects were matched to uninfected subjects; mean follow-up time was 3.3 years. Mean attributable costs per case during the initial care phase and continuing care were $277 (95% CI: $197, $357) and -$5 (-$27, $17), respectively. Attributable costs per LD subject aged 5-14 years were $440 ($132, $747), greater than the costs observed for other age strata. Expected 1-year attributable costs were $832, given continuing care costs were negligible. Limitations to our study include estimating costs using a cohort of only laboratory-confirmed LD cases, introducing selection bias for diagnosed and treated patients who may have a lower risk of developing sequelae. In conclusion, the initial care phase of LD is associated with increased healthcare costs, but without significant costs attributable to LD infection after 30 days. Estimates of costs attributable to LD are important for healthcare resource prioritization and the evaluation of novel interventions.

KEYWORDS:

Lyme disease; cost analysis; healthcare resource use

PMID:
30665259
DOI:
10.1111/zph.12560

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center