Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 15;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0223-8.

Assessing quality indicators related to mental health emergency room utilization.

Author information

1
Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. flemar@douglas.mcgill.ca.
2
Douglas Mental Health University Institute Research Centre, 6875 LaSalle Blvd., Montreal, QC, H4H 1R3, Canada. flemar@douglas.mcgill.ca.
3
Douglas Mental Health University Institute Research Centre, 6875 LaSalle Blvd., Montreal, QC, H4H 1R3, Canada.
4
Quebec National Institute of Public Health, Quebec, QC, Canada.
5
Centre de recherche et d'expertise en dépendance, Montréal, QC, Canada.
6
Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
7
Département des sciences de la santé communautaires, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
8
Centre de recherche de l'hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Longueuil, QC, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

This descriptive study compared 2014-15 to 2005-06 data on the quality of mental health services (MHS) in relation to emergency room (ER) use to assess the impact of the 2005 Quebec MH reform regarding access, continuity and appropriateness of care for patients with mental illnesses (PMI).

METHODS:

Data emanated from the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System (Quebec/Canada). Participants (865,255 for 2014-15; 817,395 for 2005-06) were age 12 or over, with at least one MI, including substance use disorders (SUD), diagnosed during an ER visit, outpatient treatment or hospitalization. Variables included: access (ER use/frequency, hospitalization rates, outpatient consultations preceding an ER visit), care continuity (outpatient consultations following an ER visit/hospitalization, consecutive returns to the ERs), and care appropriateness (high ER use, recurrence of yearly ER visits, length of hospitalization). Frequency distributions were calculated on sex, age and geographic area for ER visits/hospitalizations in 2014-15, and between 2014 and 15 and 2005-06.

RESULTS:

PMI accounted for 12 % of the Quebec population in 2014-15 (n = 865,255), of whom 39% visited an ER for any reason. Amount and frequency of ER use and number/length of hospitalizations were almost twice as high for PMI versus patients without MI; 17% of PMI were also high/very high ER users and were frequently hospitalized. Among PMI, ER users were also frequent users of outpatient services despite a lack of follow-up appointments after ER visits or hospitalizations. Findings revealed some positive changes over time, such as decreased ER and hospitalization rates; yet overall access, continuity and appropriateness of care, as measured in this study, remained low.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrated that the Quebec reform did not produce a substantial impact on ER use or substantially improved care, as hypothesized. Better access and continuity of care should be promoted to reduce the high prevalence of ER use among PMI. Quality improvement in MHS may be realized if ERs are supported by substantial and well-integrated community MH networks.

KEYWORDS:

Access to care; Appropriateness of care; Continuity of care; Emergency room; Mental illness; Quality indicators; Quality of mental health services

PMID:
30646847
PMCID:
PMC6332534
DOI:
10.1186/s12873-019-0223-8
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center