Prophphylactic bilateral salpingngectomy: why is it worthwhile?

Dev Period Med. 2018;22(4):390-395. doi: 10.34763/devperiodmed.20182204.390395.

Abstract

Malignant tumors of the ovary are characterized by late detection which is the chief factor responsible for their poor prognosis. Almost 70% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at clinical stage III or IV. At present, effective methods for early detection of ovarian cancer are lacking. One accepted approach to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer is bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. However, it is increasingly widely believed that even a more limited surgery of bilateral salpingectomy may be also used prophylactically as an effective means to reduce cancer risk. The procedure is based on extensive anatomopathological research on the origins of malignant cells in ovarian cancer. There is already ample scientific evidence that in a high proportion of cases the primary site of neoplastic transformation is the distal segment of the fallopian tube, from which malignant cells migrate to the ovary. However, long-term studies demonstrating the effectiveness of prophylactic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer are required. This article summarizes the benefits and disadvantages of the procedure based on currently available literature.

Keywords: fallopian tubes; ovarian cancer; prevention.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial / prevention & control*
  • Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / prevention & control*
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Risk Reduction Behavior*
  • Salpingectomy / methods*