Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Jan 10. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5453-1. [Epub ahead of print]

Measuring Barrett's Epithelial Thickness with Volumetric Laser Endomicroscopy as a Biomarker to Guide Treatment.

Author information

1
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA. i.levink@erasmusmc.nl.
2
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Noord 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. i.levink@erasmusmc.nl.
3
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. i.levink@erasmusmc.nl.
4
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
5
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Noord 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
6
Department of Pathology & Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment outcomes vary for unknown reasons. One hypothesis is that variations in Barrett's epithelial thickness (BET) are associated with reduced RFA efficacy for thicker BET and strictures for thinner BET. Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) is an imaging modality that acquires high-resolution, depth-resolved images of BE. However, the attenuation of light by tissue and the lack of layering in Barrett's tissue challenge BET measurements and the study of relationships between thickness and RFA outcomes. We aimed to quantify BET and compared the reliability of standard and contrast-enhanced VLE images.

METHODS:

Baseline VLE scans from BE patients without prior ablative therapy and a Prague (M) length of > 1 cm were obtained from the US VLE Registry. An algorithm was applied to the VLE images to flatten the mucosal surface and enhance the contrast of different esophageal wall layers. Subsequently, BET was measured by two independent VLE readers using both contrast- and non-contrast-enhanced datasets. In order to validate these adjusted images, intra- and interobserver agreements were calculated.

RESULTS:

VLE scans from fifty-seven patients were included in this study. BET was measured at eight equidistant locations on the selected cross-sectional images at 0.5 cm intervals from the GEJ to the proximal-most extent of BE. The intra-observer coefficients of the two readers for the contrast-enhanced images were 0.818 (95% CI 0.798-0.836) and 0.890 (95% CI 0.878-0.900). The interobserver agreement for the contrast-enhanced images (0.880; 95% CI 0.867-0.891) was significantly better than for the original images (0.778; 95% CI 0.754-0.799).

CONCLUSION:

We developed an algorithm that improves VLE visualization of the mucosal layers of the esophageal wall and enables rapid and reliable measurement of BET. Interobserver variability measurements were significantly reduced when using contrast enhancement. Studies are underway to correlate BET with treatment response.

KEYWORDS:

Barrett’s esophageal thickness (BET); Barrett’s esophagus (BE); Radiofrequency ablation (RFA); Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE)

PMID:
30632054
DOI:
10.1007/s10620-018-5453-1

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center