Format

Send to

Choose Destination
AIDS. 2019 Jan 2. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002104. [Epub ahead of print]

No effect of test and treat on sexual behaviours at population level in rural South Africa.

Author information

1
University Bordeaux, ISPED, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
2
Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences and Department of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
3
Africa Health Research Institute, School of Nursing & Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
4
Research Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
5
Centre Population et Développement, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Université Paris Descartes, Inserm, Paris, France.
6
University College London, Division of Infection and Immunity, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

CONTEXT:

Within the community-randomised ANRS 12249 Treatment-as-Prevention (TasP) trial conducted in rural South Africa, we analysed sexual behaviours stratified by sex over time, comparing immediate ART irrespective of CD4 count vs CD4-guided ART (start at CD4>350 then >500) arms.

METHODS:

As part of the 6-monthly home-based trial rounds, a sexual behaviour questionnaire (IQ) was administered to all residents ≥16 years. We considered seven indicators: sexual intercourse in the past month; at least one regular sexual partner in the past six months; at least one casual sexual partner in the past six months and more than one sexual partner in the past six months; condom use at last sex (CLS) with regular partner, CLS with casual partner, and point prevalence estimate of concurrency. We conducted repeated cross-sectional analyses, stratified by sex. GEE models were used, including trial arm, trial time, calendar time and interaction between trial arm and trial time.

RESULTS:

CLS with regular partner varied between 29%-51% and 23%- 46% for men and women, respectively, with significantly lower odds among women in the control versus intervention arm by trial end (p < 0.001). CLS with casual partner among men showed a significant interaction between arm and trial round, with no consistent pattern. Women declared more than one partner in the past 6 months in less that 1% of IQs; among men, rates varied between 5%-12%, and odds significantly and continuously declined between calendar rounds 1 and 7 (OR = 4.2 [3.24-5.45]).

CONCLUSION:

Universal Test and Treat was not associated with increased sexual risk behaviours.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center