Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018 Dec 29. pii: S1055-7903(18)30646-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.12.031. [Epub ahead of print]

Contrasting patterns of coding and flanking region evolution in mammalian keratin associated protein-1 genes.

Author information

1
International Wool Research Institute, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; Faculty of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand. Electronic address: zhouh@lincoln.ac.nz.
2
Institute of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, Massey University Auckland, Auckland 0632, New Zealand.
3
International Wool Research Institute, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; Faculty of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand.
4
Institute of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, Massey University Auckland, Auckland 0632, New Zealand; School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. Electronic address: a.ganley@auckland.ac.nz.

Abstract

Mammalian genomes contain a number of duplicated genes, and sequence identity between these duplicates can be maintained by purifying selection. However, between-duplicate recombination can also maintain sequence identity between copies, resulting in a pattern known as concerted evolution where within-genome repeats are more similar to each other than to orthologous repeats in related species. Here we investigated the tandemly-repeated keratin-associated protein 1 (KAP1) gene family, KRTAP1, which encodes proteins that are important components of hair and wool in mammals. Comparison of eutherian mammal KRTAP1 gene repeats within and between species shows a strong pattern of concerted evolution. However, in striking contrast to the coding regions of these genes, we find that the flanking regions have a divergent pattern of evolution. This contrast in evolutionary pattern transitions abruptly near the start and stop codons of the KRTAP1 genes. We reveal that this difference in evolutionary patterns is not explained by conventional purifying selection, nor is it likely a consequence of codon adaptation or reverse transcription of KRTAP1-n mRNA. Instead, the evidence suggests that these contrasting patterns result from short-tract gene conversion events that are biased to the KRTAP1 coding region by selection and/or differential sequence divergence. This work demonstrates the power that gene conversion has to finely shape the evolution of repetitive genes, and provides another distinctive pattern of contrasting evolutionary outcomes that results from gene conversion. A greater emphasis on exploring the evolution of multi-gene eukaryotic families will reveal how common different contrasting evolutionary patterns are in gene duplicates.

KEYWORDS:

concerted evolution; gene conversion; keratin associated protein; krtap1; recombination; tandem repeat

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center