Format

Send to

Choose Destination
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 19. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3329. [Epub ahead of print]

Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health: A Review.

Author information

1
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.
2
Department of Psychology, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).
3
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
4
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington.
5
Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens.
6
Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
7
School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
8
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
9
Department of Leadership, Policy and Organizations, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
10
Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Abstract

Importance:

Measurement-based care (MBC) is the systematic evaluation of patient symptoms before or during an encounter to inform behavioral health treatment. Despite MBC's demonstrated ability to enhance usual care by expediting improvements and rapidly detecting patients whose health would otherwise deteriorate, it is underused, with typically less than 20% of behavioral health practitioners integrating it into their practice. This narrative review addresses definitional issues, offers a concrete and evaluable operationalization of MBC fidelity, and summarizes the evidence base and utility of MBC. It also synthesizes the extant literature's characterization of barriers to and strategies for supporting MBC implementation, sustainment, and scale-up.

Observations:

Barriers to implementing MBC occur at multiple levels: patient (eg, concerns about confidentiality breach), practitioner (eg, beliefs that measures are no better than clinical judgment), organization (eg, no resources for training), and system (eg, competing requirements). Implementation science-the study of methods to integrate evidence-based practices such as MBC into routine care-offers strategies to address barriers. These strategies include using measurement feedback systems, leveraging local champions, forming learning collaboratives, training leadership, improving expert consultation with clinical staff, and generating incentives.

Conclusions and Relevance:

This narrative review, informed by implementation science, offers a 10-point research agenda to improve the integration of MBC into clinical practice: (1) harmonize terminology and specify MBC's core components; (2) develop criterion standard methods for monitoring fidelity and reporting quality of implementation; (3) develop algorithms for MBC to guide psychotherapy; (4) test putative mechanisms of change, particularly for psychotherapy; (5) develop brief and psychometrically strong measures for use in combination; (6) assess the critical timing of administration needed to optimize patient outcomes; (7) streamline measurement feedback systems to include only key ingredients and enhance electronic health record interoperability; (8) identify discrete strategies to support implementation; (9) make evidence-based policy decisions; and (10) align reimbursement structures.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center