Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Gen Pract. 2019 Jan;25(1):55-61. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2018.1546284. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

Re-thinking performance assessment for primary care: Opinion of the expert panel on effective ways of investing in health.

Author information

1
a Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Department of Public Health , University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam , The Netherlands.
2
b Laboratorio Management e Sanità, Institute of Management , Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies , Pisa , Italy.
3
c Inspection Générale des Affaires Sociales , Paris , France.
4
d Health Promotion Research Centre , National University of Ireland Galway , Galway , Ireland.
5
e Public Health Institute , Vilnius University , Vilnius , Lithuania.
6
f Department of Economics and Related Studies , University of York , York , UK.
7
g Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

In 2017, the European Commission (EC) identified as a policy priority the performance assessment of primary care systems, which relates to a country's primary care structure, services delivery and outcomes. The EC requested its Expert Panel on Effective Ways of Investing in Health (Expert Panel) to provide an opinion on ways for improving performance assessment of primary care.

OBJECTIVES:

To provide an overview of domains and dimensions to be taken into consideration in assessing primary care and specific indicators to be collected and analysed to improve understanding of primary care performance.

METHODS:

A sub-group of the Expert Panel performed a literature review. The opinion was drafted, improved and approved through working-group discussions, consultations with the EC, the Expert Group on Health Systems Performance Assessment, and a public hearing.

RESULTS:

Drawing on the main characteristics of primary care, we propose essential elements of a primary care performance assessment system based on specific indicators. We identified ten domains with accompanying dimensions for which comparative key indicators and descriptive indicators are proposed: (1) universal and accessible care, (2) integrated, (3) person-centred, (4) comprehensive and community-oriented care, (5) provided by a team accountable for addressing a vast majority of personal health needs, (6) sustained partnership with patients and informal caregivers, (7) coordination, (8) continuity of care, (9) primary care organization, and (10) human resources.

CONCLUSION:

The identified characteristics and criteria for development of a primary care performance assessment system provides a starting point for strengthening the coherence of assessment frameworks across countries and exchanging best practices.

KEYWORDS:

Primary care; health information; health systems; indicators; performance assessment

PMID:
30539675
PMCID:
PMC6394311
DOI:
10.1080/13814788.2018.1546284
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Taylor & Francis Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center