Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Oral Oncol. 2018 Dec;87:104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.10.032. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Author information

1
Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
2
Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: judith.lupatsch@unibas.ch.
3
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
4
Departement of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland.
5
Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
6
Department of Medical Oncology/Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Until recently, no second-line treatment for recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (r/mHNSCC) was able to improve overall survival (OS). Nivolumab has become a promising treatment for r/mHNSCC. The CheckMate-141 trial showed that nivolumab improves OS compared to investigator's choice (IC) (cetuximab, methotrexate, docetaxel). Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors is however expensive. The aim of this analysis was to assess the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab as second-line treatment for r/mHNSCC in Switzerland.

METHODS:

Based on the CheckMate-141 trial, we constructed a Markov model comparing nivolumab to IC, including follow-up data up to 24 months. We assessed costs for treatments from the perspective of the Swiss health system with a 60 months' time horizon. PD-L1 and p16 testing were considered in scenarios. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were compared to an informal willingness-to-pay of CHF (Swiss Francs) 100,000 per QALY gained.

RESULTS:

For the base case we estimated an incremental effectiveness of 0.35 QALYs and incremental costs of CHF 35,562 with nivolumab, resulting in an ICER of CHF 102,957 per QALY gained. Most influential drivers for the ICER were the price of nivolumab and the progressive disease state utility weights. In 45.5% of probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations nivolumab was estimated below 100,000 CHF/QALY. Reducing the price of nivolumab according to a consented payback by 4.75%, resulted in an ICER of CHF 98,325/QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS:

At current prices nivolumab has an ICER of around CHF 100,000 per QALY gained in the second line treatment of r/mHNSCC patients in Switzerland.

KEYWORDS:

Checkmate 141; Cost-effectiveness; Head and neck cancer; Immunotherapy; Nivolumab

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center