Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 20;37(6):453-460. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01631. Epub 2018 Dec 7.

Underdiagnosis of Hereditary Breast Cancer: Are Genetic Testing Guidelines a Tool or an Obstacle?

Author information

1
1 Dallas Surgical Group-TME/Breast Care Network, Dallas, TX.
2
2 Nashville Breast-TME/Breast Care Network, Nashville, TN.
3
3 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
4
Good Samaritan Hospital-TME/Breast Care Network, Los Gatos, CA.
5
5 Advanced Surgical Care of Northern Illinois, Barrington, IL.
6
6 Roper St Francis Healthcare, Charleston, SC.
7
7 Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
8
8 Linda Ann Smith, MD, Albuquerque, NM.
9
9 North Valley Breast Clinic, Redding, CA.
10
10 Center for Advanced Breast Care, Arlington Heights, IL.
11
11 Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY.
12
12 Alaska Breast Care Specialists, Anchorage, AK.
13
13 Dennis R. Holmes, MD, Los Angeles, CA.
14
14 Comprehensive Breast Care, Troy, MI.
15
15 Ironwood Cancer and Research Center, Scottsdale, AZ.
16
16 St Luke's University Health Network, Easton, PA.
17
17 Lyons Care Associates, Kahului, HI.
18
18 Chesapeake Regional Medical Center, Chesapeake, VA.
19
19 Hoag Hospital, Newport Beach, CA.
20
20 Breastlink, Laguna Hills, CA.
21
21 Targeted Medical Education, Allentown, PA.
22
22 Invitae, San Francisco, CA.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

An estimated 10% of breast and ovarian cancers result from hereditary causes. Current testing guidelines for germ line susceptibility genes in patients with breast carcinoma were developed to identify carriers of BRCA1/ 2 variants and have evolved in the panel-testing era. We evaluated the capability of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines to identify patients with breast cancer with pathogenic variants in expanded panel testing.

METHODS:

An institutional review board-approved multicenter prospective registry was initiated with 20 community and academic sites experienced in cancer genetic testing and counseling. Eligibility criteria included patients with a previously or newly diagnosed breast cancer who had not undergone either single- or multigene testing. Consecutive patients 18 to 90 years of age were consented and underwent an 80-gene panel test. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant electronic case report forms collected information on patient demographics, diagnoses, phenotypes, and test results.

RESULTS:

More than 1,000 patients were enrolled, and data records for 959 patients were analyzed; 49.95% met NCCN criteria, and 50.05% did not. Overall, 8.65% of patients had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant. Of patients who met NCCN guidelines with test results, 9.39% had a P/LP variant. Of patients who did not meet guidelines, 7.9% had a P/LP variant. The difference in positive results between these groups was not statistically significant (Fisher's exact test P = .4241).

CONCLUSION:

Our results indicate that nearly half of patients with breast cancer with a P/LP variant with clinically actionable and/or management guidelines in development are missed by current testing guidelines. We recommend that all patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer undergo expanded panel testing.

PMID:
30526229
PMCID:
PMC6380523
[Available on 2020-02-20]
DOI:
10.1200/JCO.18.01631

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center