Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Sports (Basel). 2018 Dec 4;6(4). pii: E163. doi: 10.3390/sports6040163.

Similar Strength and Power Adaptations between Two Different Velocity-Based Training Regimens in Collegiate Female Volleyball Players.

Author information

1
Human Performance Laboratory, Health Sciences and Human Performance Department, University of Tampa Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, USA. jacobrauch1@gmail.com.
2
Nucleus of High Performance in Sport, Sāo Paulo 03187-010, Brazil. irineu.loturco@terra.com.br.
3
Human Performance Laboratory, Health Sciences and Human Performance Department, University of Tampa Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, USA. nicholas.cheesman@spartans.ut.edu.
4
Human Performance Laboratory, Health Sciences and Human Performance Department, University of Tampa Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, USA. JTHIEL@ut.edu.
5
Human Performance Laboratory, Health Sciences and Human Performance Department, University of Tampa Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, USA. michael.alvarez@spartans.ut.edu.
6
Human Performance Laboratory, Health Sciences and Human Performance Department, University of Tampa Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, USA. nicholas.miller@spartans.ut.edu.
7
Human Performance Laboratory, Health Sciences and Human Performance Department, University of Tampa Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, USA. nathan.carpenter@spartans.ut.edu.
8
Human Performance Laboratory, Health Sciences and Human Performance Department, University of Tampa Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, USA. cbarakat@ut.edu.
9
Human Performance Laboratory, Health Sciences and Human Performance Department, University of Tampa Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, USA. gloriavelazquez@yahoo.com.
10
Human Performance Laboratory, Health Sciences and Human Performance Department, University of Tampa Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, USA. alexandria.r.stanjones@gmail.com.
11
Human Performance Laboratory, Health Sciences and Human Performance Department, University of Tampa Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, USA. daniel.aube@spartans.ut.edu.
12
Human Performance Laboratory, Health Sciences and Human Performance Department, University of Tampa Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, USA. jcandersen@ut.edu.
13
Human Performance Laboratory, Health Sciences and Human Performance Department, University of Tampa Florida, Tampa, FL 33606, USA. edesouza@ut.edu.

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of two different velocity-based training (VBT) regimens on muscular adaptations. Fifteen female college volleyball players were randomly assigned into either progressive velocity-based training (PVBT) or optimum training load (OTL). Both groups trained three times a week for seven weeks. PVBT performed a 4-week strength block (e.g., 0.55⁻0.70 m·s-1) followed by a 3-week power block (e.g., 0.85⁻1.0 m·s-1), whereas OTL performed training at ~0.85⁻0.9 m·s-1. 1RM and peak power output (PP) assessments on the back squat (BS), bench press (BP) and deadlift (DL) exercises were assessed pre and post training. There was a main time effect (p ≤ 0.05) for BS and BP 1RM, (PVBT: 19.6%, ES: 1.72; OTL: 18.3%, ES: 1.57) and (PVBT: 8.5%, ES: 0.58; OTL: 10.2%, ES: 0.72), respectively. OTL increased DL 1RM to a greater extent than PVBT (p ≤ 0.05), (OTL: 22.9%, ES: 1.49; PVBT: 10.9%, ES: 0.88). Lastly, there was a main time effect (p ≤ 0.05) for BS, BP and DL PP, (PVBT: 18.3%, ES: 0.86; OTL: 19.8%, ES: 0.79); (PVBT: 14.5%, ES: 0.81; OTL: 27.9%, ES: 1.68); (PVBT: 15.7%, ES: 1.32; OTL: 20.1%, ES: 1.77) respectively. Our data suggest that both VBT regimens are effective for improving muscular performance in college volleyball players during the offseason period.

KEYWORDS:

body composition; female athletes; optimum training load; power training; velocity-based training

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center