Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Blood Adv. 2018 Nov 27;2(22):3360-3392. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024489.

American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Author information

1
Department of Medicine and.
2
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
3
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
4
Department of Haematology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
5
Institute of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
6
Department of Haematology-Haemostasis, Trousseau Hospital, Tours, France.
7
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
8
New York, NY.
9
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
10
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
11
Columbus, OH.
12
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; and.
13
Department of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction mediated by platelet-activating antibodies that target complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Patients are at markedly increased risk of thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVE:

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about diagnosis and management of HIT.

METHODS:

ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS:

The panel agreed on 33 recommendations. The recommendations address screening of asymptomatic patients for HIT, diagnosis and initial management of patients with suspected HIT, treatment of acute HIT, and special situations in patients with acute HIT or a history of HIT, including cardiovascular surgery, percutaneous cardiovascular intervention, renal replacement therapy, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS:

Strong recommendations include use of the 4Ts score rather than a gestalt approach for estimating the pretest probability of HIT and avoidance of HIT laboratory testing and empiric treatment of HIT in patients with a low-probability 4Ts score. Conditional recommendations include the choice among non-heparin anticoagulants (argatroban, bivalirudin, danaparoid, fondaparinux, direct oral anticoagulants) for treatment of acute HIT.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center