Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Nov 27;19(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1131-y.

Beyond dialysis decisions: a qualitative exploration of decision-making among culturally and linguistically diverse adults with chronic kidney disease on haemodialysis.

Author information

1
The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia. danielle.muscat@sydney.edu.au.
2
The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
3
The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
4
The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Nepean Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
5
Department of Renal Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
6
Department of Renal Medicine and Transplantation, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
7
The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
8
The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

To date, limited research has been dedicated to exploring the experience of decision-making for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients who have initiated dialysis and have to make decisions in the context of managing multiple illnesses. Evidence about the experience of decision-making for minority or disadvantaged groups living with CKD (e.g. culturally and linguistically diverse adults; those with lower health literacy or cognitive impairment) is also lacking. This study aimed to explore the experience of healthcare decision-making among culturally and linguistically diverse adults receiving in-centre haemodialysis for advanced CKD.

METHODS:

Semi-structured interviews with English or Arabic-speaking adults recruited from four large haemodialysis units in Greater Western Sydney, Australia using stratified, purposive sampling. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using the Framework method.

RESULTS:

Interviews were conducted with 35 participants from a range of cultural backgrounds (26 English-language; 9 Arabic-language). One quarter had limited health literacy as assessed by the Single Item Literacy Screener. Four major themes were identified from the data, highlighting that participants had limited awareness of decision-points throughout the CKD trajectory (other than the decision to initiate dialysis), expressed passivity regarding their involvement in healthcare decisions, and reported inconsistent information provision within and across dialysis units. There was diversity within cultural and linguistic groups in terms of preferences and beliefs regarding religiosity, decision-making and internalised prototypical cultural values.

CONCLUSION:

Without sustained effort, adults living with CKD may be uninformed about decision points throughout the CKD trajectory and/or unengaged in the process of making decisions. While culture may be an important component of people's lives, cultural assumptions may oversimplify the diverse individual differences that exist within cultural groups.

KEYWORDS:

Chronic kidney disease (CKD), culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) patients, haemodialysis; Decision making; Health literacy; Shared decision-making

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center