Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Biosci Trends. 2018;12(5):484-490. doi: 10.5582/bst.2018.01236.

Total laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Author information

1
Department of Hepaticobiliarypancreatic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's hospital of Hangzhou medical college.
2
Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University.

Abstract

In this study, the clinical effectiveness of the robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatico-duodenectomy (RPD) and Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy LPD were retrospectively reviewed. From December 2013 to September 2017, 20 patients underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and 80 patients underwent Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. The clinical data of the RPDs and the first 20 LPDs were reviewed retrospectively. There is no difference in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and rates of complications and mortality between the LPD and RPD group. The next 10 cases in the RPD group had shorter operative times (p = 0.03) than the first 10 cases. The estimated blood loss and length of stay were also lower in the next 10 cases; however, these results did not reach statistical significance. Our results show that LPD and RPD are technically safe and feasible. Comparable results were demonstrated between the two groups, while the robotic system seemed to shorten the learning curve of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

KEYWORDS:

Laparoscopic; learning curve; pancreaticoduodenectomy; robotic

PMID:
30473556
DOI:
10.5582/bst.2018.01236
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for J-STAGE, Japan Science and Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic
Loading ...
Support Center