Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 21;13(11):e0207156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207156. eCollection 2018.

Clinical cascades as a novel way to assess physical readiness of facilities for the care of small and sick neonates in Kenya and Uganda.

Author information

1
Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
2
Institute of Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
3
Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive, and Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
4
Department of Pediatrics, Jinja Regional Referral Hospital, Jinja, Uganda.
5
Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Maseno University, Maseno, Kenya.
6
Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Centre of Excellence, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
7
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
8
Center for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
9
School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
10
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Globally, there were 2.7 million neonatal deaths in 2015. Significant mortality reduction could be achieved by improving care in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), where the majority of deaths occur. Determining the physical readiness of facilities to identify and manage complications is an essential component of strategies to reduce neonatal mortality.

METHODS:

We developed clinical cascades for 6 common neonatal conditions then utilized these to assess 23 health facilities in Kenya and Uganda at 2 time-points in 2016 and 2017. We calculated changes in resource availability over time by facility using McNemar's test. We estimated mean readiness and loss of readiness for the 6 conditions and 3 stages of care (identification, treatment, monitoring-modifying treatment). We estimated overall mean readiness and readiness loss across all conditions and stages. Finally, we compared readiness of facilities with a newborn special care unit (NSCU) to those without using the two-sample test of proportions.

RESULTS:

The cascade model estimated mean readiness of 26.3-26.6% across the 3 stages for all conditions. Mean readiness ranged from 11.6% (respiratory distress-apnea) to 47.8% (essential newborn care) across both time-points. The model estimated overall mean readiness loss of 30.4-31.9%. There was mild to moderate variability in the timing of readiness loss, with the majority occurring in the identification stage. Overall mean readiness was higher among facilities with a NSCU (36.8%) compared to those without (20.0%).

CONCLUSION:

The cascade model provides a novel approach to quantitatively assess physical readiness for neonatal care. Among 23 facilities in Kenya and Uganda, we identified a consistent pattern of 30-32% readiness loss across cascades and stages. This aggregate measure could be used to monitor and compare readiness at the facility-, health system-, or national-level. Estimates of readiness and loss of readiness may help guide strategies to improve care, prioritize resources, and promote neonatal survival in LMICs.

PMID:
30462671
PMCID:
PMC6248954
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0207156
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center