Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Nat Methods. 2018 Dec;15(12):1126. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0237-2.

Author Correction: Comprehensive comparative analysis of 5'-end RNA-sequencing methods.

Author information

1
Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
2
Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
3
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
4
Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Medical Research Council, Cambridge, UK.
5
Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. aregev@broad.mit.edu.
6
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. aregev@broad.mit.edu.
7
Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. aregev@broad.mit.edu.
8
The David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. aregev@broad.mit.edu.
9
Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. jlevin@broadinstitute.org.
10
Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. jlevin@broadinstitute.org.

Abstract

The original version of this paper contained an incorrect primer sequence. In the Methods subsection "Rampage libraries," the text for modification 3 stated that the reverse primer used for library indexing was 5'-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATXXXXXXXXGTGACTGGAGT-3'. The correct sequence of the oligonucleotide used is 5'-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATXXXXXXXXGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCT-3'. This error has been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the paper.

PMID:
30459407
DOI:
10.1038/s41592-018-0237-2

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group
Loading ...
Support Center