Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Cancer. 2018 Nov 13. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31835. [Epub ahead of print]

Molecular monitoring of therapeutic milestones and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

Author information

1
Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
2
Department of Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
3
Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
4
Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
5
Department of Hematology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
6
Department of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
7
University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
8
University of Quebec Center of Hematology and Oncology, University of Quebec Health Centre, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

In the current study, the authors determined whether adhering to molecular monitoring guidelines in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is associated with major molecular response (MMR) and assessed barriers to adherent monitoring.

METHODS:

Newly treated patients with CML from the Quebec province-wide CML registry from 2005 to 2016 were included. Timely polymerase chain reaction (tPCR) was defined as the molecular assessment of BCR -ABL1 at the 3-month, 12-month, and 18-month time points from the initiation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. The cohort was analyzed as a nested case-control study. Cases with a first-ever MMR (BCR-ABL1 ≤0.1%, assessed at any time during follow-up) were matched to up to 5 controls by duration of TKI therapy, volume of patients with CML at the treatment center, year of cohort entry, and age. Odds ratios (ORs) for the performance of tPCR and MMR were adjusted for sex, comorbidities, type of TKI, and other important covariates.

RESULTS:

The cohort included 496 patients. Of 392 MMR events, 67.9% occurred before 18 months. The performance of tPCR was associated with a doubling of the MMR rate (OR, 2.23; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.56-3.21) and was similar with 1 to 3 tPCRs performed (P = .67). Furthermore, tPCRs at 3 months (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.81-4.23) and 12 months (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.64-5.49) were associated with achieving early MMR, whereas tPCRs at 18 months were not (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.80-1.89). Low-volume centers were found to have lower adherence to tPCR (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS:

Timely molecular assessment at 3 months and 12 months appears to benefit patients with CML. Adherence to timely monitoring should be encouraged, especially in low-volume treatment centers.

KEYWORDS:

chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); drug monitoring; epidemiology; guideline adherence; observational study

PMID:
30423211
DOI:
10.1002/cncr.31835

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center