Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2018 Dec;17(4):191-200. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000154.

Implementation of the HEART Pathway: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Author information

1
From the Departments of Social Sciences and Health Policy and Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC.
2
Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, and Qualitative and Patient-Reported Outcomes Developing Shared Resource, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC.
3
Division of Emergency Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
4
Department of Emergency Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
5
Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina.
6
Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
7
Departments of Emergency Medicine, Implementation Science, and Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The HEART Pathway is an evidence-based decision tool for identifying emergency department (ED) patients with acute chest pain who are candidates for early discharge, to reduce unhelpful and potentially harmful hospitalizations. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we sought to identify important barriers and facilitators to implementation of the HEART Pathway.

STUDY SETTING:

Data were collected at 4 academic medical centers.

STUDY DESIGN:

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 key stakeholders (e.g., health system leaders, ED physicians). We conducted interviews before implementation of the HEART Pathway tool to identify potential barriers and facilitators to successful adoption at other regional academic medical centers. We also conducted postimplementation interviews at 1 medical center, to understand factors that contributed to successful adoption.

DATA COLLECTION:

Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework-driven deductive approach for coding and analysis.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:

Potential barriers to implementation include time and resource burden, challenges specific to the electronic health record, sustained communication with and engagement of stakeholders, and patient concerns. Facilitators to implementation include strength of evidence for reduced length of stay and unnecessary testing and iatrogenic complications, ease of use, and supportive provider climate for evidence-based decision tools.

CONCLUSIONS:

Successful dissemination of the HEART Pathway will require addressing institution-specific barriers, which includes engaging clinical and financial stakeholders. New SMART-FHIR technologies, compatible with many electronic health record systems, can overcome barriers to health systems with limited information technology resources.

PMID:
30418249
PMCID:
PMC6234854
[Available on 2019-12-01]
DOI:
10.1097/HPC.0000000000000154

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center