A comparison of an enzyme immunoassay and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genito-urinary specimens

Sex Transm Dis. 1988 Apr-Jun;15(2):123-6. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198804000-00013.

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis infection is easy to treat but laborious to diagnose by culture. An antigen-detecting enzyme immunoassay (EIA; Chlamydiazyme, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL), suitable for testing many samples, was compared with the conventional iodine-stained, one-passage culture. A total of 471 duplicate samples from 218 men (urethra) and 128 women (urethra and cervix) attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic were examined by both tests. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of positive and negative results were 80.3%, 96.7%, 86.4%, and 95.0%, respectively. No difference between male and female patients was observed. A remarkable difference between sensitivities of female urethral (60.0%) and cervical (95.5%) samples was found. This difference is clearly important in cases of women with urethral infection only (19% in our study) and points to the need for further improvement of this EIA.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Bacteriological Techniques*
  • Chlamydia Infections / diagnosis*
  • Chlamydia Infections / microbiology
  • Chlamydia trachomatis / immunology
  • Chlamydia trachomatis / isolation & purification*
  • Female
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique
  • Humans
  • Immunoenzyme Techniques*
  • Male
  • Sex Factors
  • Urethritis / diagnosis*
  • Urethritis / microbiology
  • Uterine Cervicitis / diagnosis
  • Uterine Cervicitis / microbiology