Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206434. eCollection 2018.

Automatic or manual arterial path for the ankle-brachial differences pulse wave velocity.

Author information

1
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara, Extremadura Health Service, Cáceres, Spain.
2
Iberian Network on Central Hemodynamic and Arterial Structure, Salamanca, Spain.
3
Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Occupational Therapy, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
4
Zona Centro Health Center, Extremadura Health Service, Cáceres, Spain.
5
Biomedical Research Institute of Salamanca (IBSAL), Primary Health Care Research Unit, La Alamedilla Health Center, Castilla León Health Service, Salamanca, Spain.
6
Hospital of Sagunto, University Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
7
Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.

Abstract

An automated method for measuring arterial path length with devices that determine pulse wave velocity (PWV) in peripheral arteries is frequently applied. We aimed to compare arterial path length measurements based on mathematical height-based formulas with those measured manually and to assess whether the ankle-brachial difference (abD-PWV) measured with the VOPITB device is comparable to that obtained by manual measurements. In 245 patients, a metric measuring tape was used to determine the arterial path length from the suprasternal notch to the midpoint of the VOPITB cuffs wrapped around the extremities, and the results were compared with those obtained with height-based formulas. We examined the relationship between the abD-PWV measured with both methods. The arterial path length measured manually was shorter than that calculated automatically by 5 ± 2 and 30 ± 4 cm-of 13% and 21% for the arms and legs, respectively (difference of 13% and 21%). As a result, the abD-PWV calculated with the automatic method was greater (automatic abD-PWV vs. manual: 462 ± 90 vs. 346 ± 79 cm/s). The Blant Altman plot showed a percentage error of: 15,2%, 7,5% and 17,3% for heart-brachial, heart-ankle length and abD-PWV respectively. In conclusion there were significant differences between manual and automated arterial length measurements and it translates into difference abD-PWV calculate from both methods. However, the Bland-Alman plot showed that abD-PWV was comparable for both techniques. The advantages of height-based formulas for the calculation of arterial path lengths suggest that they may be the recommended method for measuring the abD-PWV.

PMID:
30383780
PMCID:
PMC6211696
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0206434
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center