Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Malar J. 2018 Oct 29;17(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2553-5.

"Wherever doctors cannot reach, the sunshine can": overcoming potential barriers to malaria elimination interventions in Haiti.

Author information

1
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal School of Public Health, CP 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C3J7, Canada. thomas.druetz@umontreal.ca.
2
Institut de Recherche en Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada. thomas.druetz@umontreal.ca.
3
Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Tropical Medicine, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA. thomas.druetz@umontreal.ca.
4
Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA.
5
Centre d'Évaluation et de Recherche Appliquée, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
6
The Carter Center, Atlanta, USA.
7
Ministry of Public Health and Population, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
8
Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Tropical Medicine, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Haiti and the Dominican Republic, the only two Caribbean countries with endemic malaria transmission, are committed to eliminating malaria. With a Plasmodium falciparum prevalence under 1% and a highly focal transmission, the efforts towards elimination in Haiti will include several community-based interventions that must be tailored to the local sociocultural context to increase their uptake. However, little is known about local community perceptions regarding malaria and the planned elimination interventions. The aim of this study is to develop a robust understanding of how to tailor, implement and promote malaria elimination strategies in Haiti.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted December 2015-August 2016 in Grande-Anse and the North Department in Haiti. Data collection included key informant interviews (n = 51), in-depth interviews (n = 15) and focus group discussions (n = 14) with health workers, traditional healers, teachers, priests or pastors, informal community leaders, public officials, and community members. Following a grounded theory approach, transcripts were coded and analysed using content analysis. Coded text was sorted by the types of interventions under consideration by the malaria elimination programme.

RESULTS:

The level of knowledge about malaria was low. Many participants noted community beliefs about malaria being caused by magical phenomena in addition to vector-borne transmission. Participants described malaria as a problem rooted in the environment, with vector control the most noted method of prevention. Though participants noted malaria a severe disease, it ranked lower than other health problems perceived as more acute. Access barriers to healthcare were described including a lack of bed nets. Some distrust about pills, tests, and foreigners in general was expressed, and in few cases linked to previous experience with malaria campaigns under dictatorial regimes.

CONCLUSIONS:

There are several potential barriers and opportunities to implement community-based malaria elimination interventions in rural Haiti. Elimination efforts should include the collaboration of voodoo priests and other traditional healers, be coupled with solutions to wider community concerns or other health interventions, and learn from previous or similar programmes, such as the campaign to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. It is essential to engage with communities and gain their trust to successfully implement targeted aggressive elimination activities.

PMID:
30373575
PMCID:
PMC6206681
DOI:
10.1186/s12936-018-2553-5
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center