Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Vaccine. 2018 Nov 19;36(48):7377-7384. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.019. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

Recent vaccine mandates in the United States, Europe and Australia: A comparative study.

Author information

1
Political Science and International Relations, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Australia. Electronic address: Katie.attwell@uwa.edu.au.
2
Department of Philosophy, Oakland University, 146 Library Drive, Rochester, MI 48309-4479, USA.
3
Department of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Lungarno Antonio Pacinotti, 43, 56126 Pisa Pl, Italy.
4
Sante Publique France, 12 rue du Val d'Osne, 94415 Saint-Maurice Cedex, France.
5
Infectious Diseases, Antimicrobial Resistance, Hygiene, Vaccination Federal Ministry of Health, Bundesministerium für Gesundheit Referat, 322 Friedrichstraße 108, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
6
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 20211, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

In response to recent outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases and concerns around vaccine refusal, several high-income countries have adopted or reformed vaccine mandate policies. While all make it more difficult for parents to refuse vaccines, the nature and scope of 'mandatory vaccination' is heterogeneous, and there has been no attempt to develop a detailed, comparative systematic account of the possible forms mandates can take.

METHODS:

We compare the construction, introduction/amendment, and operation of six new high profile vaccine mandates in Australia, France, Germany, Italy, California, and Washington. We rank these policies in order of their relative restrictiveness and analyze other differences between them.

RESULTS:

New mandate instruments differ in their effects on behavior, and with regard to their structure, exemptions, target populations, consequences and enforcement. We identify diverse means by which vaccine mandates can restrict behaviors, various degrees of severity, and different gradations of intensity in enforcement.

CONCLUSION:

We suggest that politico-cultural context and vaccine policy history are centrally important factors for vaccine mandate policymakers to consider. It matters whether citizens trust their governments to limit individual freedom in the name of public health, and whether citizens have previously been subjected to vaccine mandates. Furthermore, political communities must consider the diverse mechanisms by which they may construct vaccine mandate policies; whether through emergency decrees or ordinary statutes, and how (or whether) to involve various stakeholder groups in developing and implementing new vaccine mandate policies.

KEYWORDS:

Immunization; Mandates; Mandatory; Policy; Vaccination

PMID:
30337171
DOI:
10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.019
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center