Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 May;23(5):2331-2338. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2657-x. Epub 2018 Oct 6.

Retentive force of PEEK secondary crowns on zirconia primary crowns over time.

Author information

1
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestraße 70, 80336, Munich, Germany. oliver.schubert@med.uni-muenchen.de.
2
Dental Team GmbH, Weißachener Str. 46, 83346, Bergen, Germany.
3
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestraße 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the retentive forces of CAD/CAM-fabricated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) secondary crowns on zirconia primary crowns over an artificial aging period representing 10 years of clinical service and compare them to electroformed secondary crowns made from pure gold.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Implant-supported zirconia primary crowns (N = 20) were CAD/CAM milled and provided either with electroformed secondary crowns (group ZE; N = 10) or CAD/CAM-fabricated PEEK secondary crowns (group ZP; N = 10). All secondary crowns were attached to a casted tertiary structure to ensure adequate stability. A universal testing machine was used to determine the retentive force values at baseline and after 1, 3, 5, and 10 years of simulated aging in the presence of artificial saliva. Data were analyzed applying Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U test. Level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS:

Retentive forces were not different for the groups ZE and ZP at baseline (median ZE 2.85 N; ZP 2.8 N; p ≤ 0.218). Because retentive force values changed significantly over simulation time for group ZE (Kruskal-Wallis; p ≤ 0.028), the values between the test groups ZE and ZP differed significantly (Mann-Whitney U) at 5 years (ZE 3.03 N; ZP 2.76 N; p ≤ 0.003) and 10 years (ZE 3.1 N; ZP 2.78 N; p ≤ 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS:

PEEK secondary crowns exhibit stable retentive force values over 10 years of simulated aging showing no signs of deterioration while the retentive force values of electroformed secondary crowns increase over time.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE:

PEEK might be a suitable alternative to proven metallic materials for the fabrication of secondary crowns.

KEYWORDS:

CAD/CAM; Double crowns; Electroforming; Implant prosthetics; Polyetheretherketone (PEEK); Retentive force; Zirconia

PMID:
30293185
DOI:
10.1007/s00784-018-2657-x
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center