Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Contraception. 2019 Jan;99(1):56-60. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 26.

Women's preferences for permanent contraception method and willingness to be randomized for a hypothetical trial.

Author information

1
University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
2
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
3
University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA. Electronic address: mdcreinin@ucdavis.edu.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To understand women's preferences for permanent contraception by salpingectomy or tubal occlusion following standardized counseling and evaluate the practicality of a future randomized trial.

STUDY DESIGN:

We invited pregnant and non-pregnant women planning permanent contraception at the University of California, Davis (UCD) and University of Tennessee (UT) Obstetrics and Gynecology clinics to participate. We enrolled women when they received routine counseling and signed procedure consent. Participants received standardized information sheets reviewing permanent contraception options based on pregnancy status then completed an anonymous survey with questions about demographics, method preference, and willingness to participate in a hypothetical randomized trial comparing salpingectomy and tubal occlusion. We evaluated predictors for salpingectomy preference using multivariable analysis.

RESULTS:

From July 2015 to October 2016, we enrolled 75 women at UCD and 63 women at UT. Overall, respondents preferred salpingectomy (63.0%); among the 47 women not currently pregnant at both sites, 40 (85.1%) preferred salpingectomy, most commonly because of higher efficacy. Although population characteristics differed significantly between the sites, only UCD site (aOR 4.2; 95% CI 1.9, 9.4) and non-pregnancy status (aOR 4.2; 95% CI 1.6, 10.8) predicted preference for salpingectomy in the multivariable model. Most participants (n=84, 60.9%) would not be willing to be randomized to a theoretical trial comparing salpingectomy and tubal occlusion procedures.

CONCLUSION:

Among a diverse group of women from two different areas in the U.S. given a choice of permanent contraception methods, salpingectomy is preferred over tubal occlusion. Most women planning a permanent contraceptive procedure would not agree to a randomized comparison of these methods.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT:

Salpingectomy, which offers theoretically higher efficacy and potentially greater ovarian cancer protection compared to tubal occlusion, is preferred by the majority of patients and should be offered to all women seeking permanent contraception. Differences in method choices less likely reflect the patient population and more likely the counseling provided.

KEYWORDS:

Permanent contraception; Randomization; Salpingectomy; Sterilization

PMID:
30266212
PMCID:
PMC6425927
[Available on 2020-01-01]
DOI:
10.1016/j.contraception.2018.09.004

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center