Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Data Brief. 2018 Sep 8;20:1629-1638. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.214. eCollection 2018 Oct.

Distribution of evaluation scores for the models submitted to the second cryo-EM model challenge.

Author information

1
Genome Center, University of California, Davis, 451 Health Sciences Drive, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
2
Molecular Biophysics & Integrated Bioimaging, LBNL, CA 94720, USA.
3
Department of Bioengineering, University of California Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
4
Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine and Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 174 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
5
Department of Bioengineering, Microbiology and Immunology and Photon Science, Stanford University, James H. Clark Center, MC5447, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5447, USA.

Abstract

142 protein structure models were submitted to second Cryo-EM model challenge (2015-2016). Accuracy of the models was evaluated with 54 evaluation scores. Results of the descriptive statistical analysis of the scores are provided in this article.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center