Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 23. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27816. [Epub ahead of print]

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing PCI: Insights from the TRANSLATE ACS study.

Author information

1
Cardiology Division, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
2
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
3
Cardiovascular division, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
4
Daiichi Sankyo, lnc, Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
5
Cardiovascular division, John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana.
6
Cardiovascular division, Columbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Concomitant use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) and P2Y12 inhibitors increases bleeding risk. How GPIs are being used with faster onset, higher potency P2Y12 inhibitors are unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS:

We studied 11,781 myocardial infarction (MI) patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at 233 hospitals in the TRANSLATE ACS study (2010-2012). We used propensity matching to compare 6-week major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, recurrent MI, stroke, or unplanned revascularization) and BARC 2+ bleeding events between patients who did and did not receive planned GPI. Planned and bailout GPI were used in 4,983 (42.2%) and 229 (4.4%) MI patients undergoing PCI, respectively. Patients receiving planned GPI were younger (58 vs. 61 years), more likely to present with STEMI (62.6% vs. 45.4%) or have stent thrombosis (4.2% vs. 2.1%, all P < 0.001) than those without planned GPI use. Planned GPI was used less often with prasugrel/ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (37.1% vs. 43.3%), or when any P2Y12 inhibitor was given >6 hr prior to PCI versus earlier (27.8% vs. 44.4%, both P < 0.01). After propensity matching, planned GPI use was not associated with any difference in MACE (6.4% vs. 5.5% OR 1.18; 95% CI: 0.99-1.57), however, the risk of BARC 2+ bleeding was higher in patients who received planned GPI (11.3% vs. 8.7%; OR 1.34; 95% CI: 1.13-1.59).

CONCLUSION:

Planned GPI use as reported by practicing physicians was prevalent between 2010 and 2012 and was associated with increased risk of bleeding but not lower MACE.

KEYWORDS:

MACE; TRANSLATE-ACS; bleeding; glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors

PMID:
30244509
DOI:
10.1002/ccd.27816

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center