Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4791-x.

Development and validation of a new predictive model for breast cancer survival in New Zealand and comparison to the Nottingham prognostic index.

Author information

1
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, 261 Morrin Road, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand. mark.elwood@auckland.ac.nz.
2
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, 261 Morrin Road, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
3
Waikato Clinical Campus, Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand.
4
Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand.
5
Regional Cancer and Blood Centre, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
6
The University of Waikato, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The only available predictive models for the outcome of breast cancer patients in New Zealand (NZ) are based on data in other countries. We aimed to develop and validate a predictive model using NZ data for this population, and compare its performance to a widely used overseas model, the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI).

METHODS:

We developed a model to predict 10-year breast cancer-specific survival, using data collected prospectively in the largest population-based regional breast cancer registry in NZ (Auckland, 9182 patients), and assessed its performance in this data set (internal validation) and in an independent NZ population-based series of 2625 patients in Waikato (external validation). The data included all women with primary invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 1 June 2000 to 30 June 2014, with follow up to death or Dec 31, 2014. We used multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression to assess predictors and to calculate predicted 10-year breast cancer mortality, and therefore survival, probability for each patient. We assessed observed survival by the Kaplan Meier method. We assessed discrimination by the C statistic, and calibration by comparing predicted and observed survival rates for patients in 10 groups ordered by predicted 10-year survival. We compared this NZ model with the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in this validation data set.

RESULTS:

Discrimination was good: C statistics were 0.84 for internal validity and 0.83 for an independent external validity. For calibration, for both internal and external validity the predicted 10-year survival probabilities in all groups of patients, ordered by predicted survival, were within the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the observed Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities. The NZ model showed good discrimination even within the prognostic groups defined by the NPI.

CONCLUSIONS:

These results for the New Zealand model show good internal and external validity, transportability, and potential clinical value of the model, and its clear superiority over the NPI. Further research is needed to assess other potential predictors, to assess the model's performance in specific subgroups of patients, and to compare it to other models, which have been developed in other countries and have not yet been tested in NZ.

KEYWORDS:

Breast cancer; Mortality; New Zealand; Nottingham prognostic index; Predictive model; Prognosis; Survival

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center