Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Primates. 2019 May;60(3):167-181. doi: 10.1007/s10329-018-0682-7. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

Mechanisms of network evolution: a focus on socioecological factors, intermediary mechanisms, and selection pressures.

Author information

1
Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC, UMR 7178, Strasbourg, France. cedric.sueur@iphc.cnrs.fr.
2
Kyoto University Primate Research Institute, Inuyama, Japan.
3
Primates and Evolution Anthropology Laboratory, Anthropology Department, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
4
Institute for Religion, Philosophy and History, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.

Abstract

Since group-living animals are embedded in a network of social interactions, socioecological factors may not only affect individual behavioral strategies but also the patterning of group-level social interactions, i.e., the network structure. These co-variations between socioecological factors, individual behavior, and group-level structure are important to study since ecological factors may strongly influence animal health outcomes and reproductive success. Besides factors such as social information and/or infectious agents, with far-reaching individual fitness consequences, seem independent of individuals' own social interactions but directly affected by the topology of the social network. This paper reviews how socio-ecological pressures, i.e., causal factors (food distribution, predation, and infectious agent risk), via intermediary mechanisms (stress, information sharing, and mating system), may affect individual social behavior and consequently, social network topology. We also discuss how evolutionary driving forces, genetic (i.e., genes) and cultural (i.e., learned behavior) selection, may result in a specific composition of individuals' social strategies that produce network topologies that might be optimized to specific socio-ecological conditions. We conclude that studies focusing on whether and how well networks resist changing conditions might provide a better understanding of the rules underlying individual behavior, which in turn influences network topology-a process we have called network evolution. Evolutionary processes may favor a group phenotypic composition, thus a network topology. This has been referred to as a "collective social niche construction".

KEYWORDS:

Cultural brain hypothesis; Fitness; Group-living trade-off, cultural evolution; Multi-level selection; Sociality

PMID:
30206778
DOI:
10.1007/s10329-018-0682-7

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center