Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int Wound J. 2018 Dec;15(6):1010-1024. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12968. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

Understanding the Hawthorne effect in wound research-A scoping review.

Author information

1
Alfred Health Clinical School, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Abstract

The Hawthorne Effect (HE) is considered a methodological artefact in research, although its definition and influence on research outcomes lack consensus. This review explored how this term has been mentioned and discussed in the area of wound research. A scoping review was conducted on ProQuest Central, Scopus, EbscoHost, and online databases of indexed wound journals using the methodological framework by Arksey and Malley. A review protocol was applied to detail key terms, truncation and Boolean operators, and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Search findings were reported using PRISMA guidelines. A total of 38 articles reporting primary evidence were identified. Three themes emerged from the review: wound researchers' awareness of HE, the acknowledgement of the existence or otherwise of HE, and the mentioning of HE in passing. These results reflect a lack of attention to and understanding and awareness of the HE in the area of wound research. It is suggested that the HE receives more attention as a methodological concern, and its potential influence is considered and mitigated when planning future studies. Recommendations are provided to minimise the impact of the HE on the rigour of the research and confidence afforded to research findings.

KEYWORDS:

Hawthorne effect; observer bias; observer effect; wound research

PMID:
30136375
DOI:
10.1111/iwj.12968
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center