Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Theor Biol Med Model. 2018 Aug 20;15(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12976-018-0084-y.

Application of Bayesian evidence synthesis to modelling the effect of ketogenic therapy on survival of high grade glioma patients.

Author information

1
Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Robert-Koch-Straße 10, 97422, Schweinfurt, Germany. rainer_klement@gmx.de.
2
Department of History & Philosophy, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
3
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
4
Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Medical University Poznan, Poznan, Poland.
5
Department of Psychology, University Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Ketogenic therapy in the form of ketogenic diets or calorie restriction has been proposed as a metabolic treatment of high grade glioma (HGG) brain tumors based on mechanistic reasoning obtained mainly from animal experiments. Given the paucity of clinical studies of this relatively new approach, our goal is to extrapolate evidence from the greater number of animal studies and synthesize it with the available human data in order to estimate the expected effects of ketogenic therapy on survival in HGG patients. At the same time we are using this analysis as an example for demonstrating how Bayesianism can be applied in the spirit of a circular view of evidence.

RESULTS:

A Bayesian hierarchical model was developed. Data from three human cohort studies and 17 animal experiments were included to estimate the effects of four ketogenic interventions (calorie restriction/ketogenic diets as monotherapy/combination therapy) on the restricted mean survival time ratio in humans using various assumptions for the relationships between humans, rats and mice. The impact of different biological assumptions about the relevance of animal data for humans as well as external information based on mechanistic reasoning or case studies was evaluated by specifying appropriate priors. We provide statistical and philosophical arguments for why our approach is an improvement over existing (frequentist) methods for evidence synthesis as it is able to utilize evidence from a variety of sources. Depending on the prior assumptions, a 30-70% restricted mean survival time prolongation in HGG patients was predicted by the models. The highest probability of a benefit (> 90%) for all four ketogenic interventions was obtained when adopting an enthusiastic prior based on previous case reports together with assuming synergism between ketogenic therapies with other forms of treatment. Combinations with other treatments were generally found more effective than ketogenic monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Combining evidence from both human and animal studies is statistically possible using a Bayesian approach. We found an overall survival-prolonging effect of ketogenic therapy in HGG patients. Our approach is best compatible with a circular instead of hierarchical view of evidence and easy to update once more data become available.

KEYWORDS:

Bayesian evidence synthesis; Calorie restriction; Evidence based medicine; High grade glioma; Ketogenic diet; Philosophy of medicine; Philosophy of science

PMID:
30122157
PMCID:
PMC6100754
DOI:
10.1186/s12976-018-0084-y
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center