Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Qual Life Res. 2018 Dec;27(12):3157-3166. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1968-3. Epub 2018 Aug 14.

A qualitative study of patients' perceptions of the utility of patient-reported outcome measures of symptoms in primary care clinics.

Author information

1
Regenstrief Institute, 1101 West 10th St, RF 224-1, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. tltalib@regenstrief.org.
2
Regenstrief Institute, 1101 West 10th St, RF 224-1, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
3
University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
4
Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
5
Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
6
Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Sleep, pain, anxiety, depression, and low energy/fatigue (SPADE pentad) symptoms are common, but often unrecognized and undertreated in primary care. In an effort to improve symptom outcomes, primary care clinics are integrating patient-reported outcome measures (PROs), such as the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS), into practice. Whether patients with SPADE symptoms perceive these measures as useful is unknown. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore patients' perceptions of the utility of symptom-based PROs in primary care.

METHODS:

As part of a mixed-methods study, 23 patients (age 24-77 years) with one or more SPADE symptoms participated in one-on-one interviews about the use, implementation and visual display of PROMIS. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS:

Five themes emerged: (1) PROs may foster communication about symptoms; (2) data from PROs may prompt clinical actions; (3) the visual display of symptom scores could be useful for patients and providers, though modifications may enhance interpretation; (4) implementation may vary according to patients' perception of PRO features (e.g., length); and (5) PROs may be useful, but only to the extent that they are valued, prioritized, and used.

CONCLUSIONS:

According to patients, the use of PROs to measure symptoms in primary care clinics has the potential to be useful. However, patients are reluctant to complete PROs if they perceive that clinicians do not use the measures to improve care. Barriers to implementation in primary care (e.g., duration of visit) should be addressed to enhance the utility of PROs. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02383862.

KEYWORDS:

Patient-reported outcome measures; Primary care; Qualitative; Symptoms

PMID:
30109471
DOI:
10.1007/s11136-018-1968-3
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center