Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 10;8(8):e022224. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022224.

Impact of maternity waiting homes on facility delivery among remote households in Zambia: protocol for a quasiexperimental, mixed-methods study.

Author information

1
Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
2
Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
3
Right to Care Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
4
National Health Research Authority, Pediatric Centre of Excellence, Lusaka, Zambia.
5
Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
6
Center for Global Affairs and PAHO/WHO Collaborating Center, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
7
Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Maternity waiting homes (MWHs) aim to improve access to facility delivery in rural areas. However, there is limited rigorous evidence of their effectiveness. Using formative research, we developed an MWH intervention model with three components: infrastructure, management and linkage to services. This protocol describes a study to measure the impact of the MWH model on facility delivery among women living farthest (≥10 km) from their designated health facility in rural Zambia. This study will generate key new evidence to inform decision-making for MWH policy in Zambia and globally.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS:

We are conducting a mixed-methods quasiexperimental impact evaluation of the MWH model using a controlled before-and-after design in 40 health facility clusters. Clusters were assigned to the intervention or control group using two methods: 20 clusters were randomly assigned using a matched-pair design; the other 20 were assigned without randomisation due to local political constraints. Overall, 20 study clusters receive the MWH model intervention while 20 control clusters continue to implement the 'standard of care' for waiting mothers. We recruit a repeated cross section of 2400 randomly sampled recently delivered women at baseline (2016) and endline (2018); all participants are administered a household survey and a 10% subsample also participates in an in-depth interview. We will calculate descriptive statistics and adjusted ORs; qualitative data will be analysed using content analysis. The primary outcome is the probability of delivery at a health facility; secondary outcomes include utilisation of MWHs and maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:

Ethical approvals were obtained from the Boston University Institutional Review Board (IRB), University of Michigan IRB (deidentified data only) and the ERES Converge IRB in Zambia. Written informed consent is obtained prior to data collection. Results will be disseminated to key stakeholders in Zambia, then through open-access journals, websites and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:

NCT02620436; Pre-results.

KEYWORDS:

Zambia; impact evaluation; maternal health; maternity waiting home; mixed methods; skilled birth attendance

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center