Objectives: The management of patients with locally advanced thymic malignancies remains controversial. Differing combinations of surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiation are used in the management of initial and relapsed disease. Treatment-related toxicities and quality of life could inform therapeutic options. This study describes health utility scores (HUS) in survivors with locally advanced thymic malignancies and investigates the impact of multimodality regimens on HUS.
Methods: In a cross-sectional study (2014-2017), patients with Masaoka Stage II-IVa thymic malignancies completed various self-reported questionnaires, including EuroQol-5-Dimensions with visual analogue scale (VAS), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale tools. Trimodality versus uni- or bimodality regimens and aggressive versus non-aggressive management of recurrent disease were compared using regression analyses.
Results: Of the 72 patients, 43 (60%) were male with a median age of 58 years, 65 (90%) had thymoma while 7 (10%) had thymic carcinomas; and median time since diagnosis was 50.5 months (range: 3-266). Median HUS and VAS did not differ between groups (trimodality n = 24 vs uni- or bimodality n = 48: HUS = 0.77 vs 0.80, P = 0.29; VAS = 80 vs 75, P = 0.79, respectively). The distributions of patient-reported ECOG were also similar (P = 0.86). Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale scores for every assessed symptom were similar for different modalities of therapy. Median scores on these tools were also similar regardless of recurrence status or management of relapsed disease (aggressive versus non-aggressive).
Conclusion: Survivors with Stage II-IVa thymic malignancies report favourable HUS, VAS and self-reported ECOG with minimal symptom burden. These outcomes may be independent of number and type of initial treatment modalities or management of recurrence.