Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Value Health. 2018 Jul;21(7):874-880. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.014. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

Medical Treatments for Acromegaly: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Author information

1
Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
2
Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
3
Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. Electronic address: pontarolo@ufpr.br.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Acromegaly results from the hypersecretion of growth hormone. Because of the low incidence rates of this disease worldwide, few clinical trials evaluating drug treatments have been conducted.

OBJECTIVES:

To conduct the first network meta-analysis simultaneously comparing all available drugs used in acromegaly treatment so as to provide more robust evidence in this field.

METHODS:

A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Cochrane Collaboration recommendations (PROSPERO database under the registration number CRD42017059880). The electronic searches were conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing any drug for the treatment of acromegaly head-to-head or versus placebo were included. Outcomes concerning the efficacy and safety of treatments were evaluated. The statistical analyses were performed using Aggregate Data Drug Information System version 1.16.8 (drugis.org, Groningen, The Netherlands).

RESULTS:

The initial search retrieved 2059 articles. Of these, 10 randomized controlled trials were included in a qualitative analysis and 7 in a quantitative analysis. The network meta-analysis for the efficacy outcome (number of patients achieving insulinlike growth factor 1 control) showed that pegvisomant and lanreotide autogel were statistically superior to placebo (odds ratio [95% credible interval] 0.06 [0.00-0.55] and 0.09 [0.01-0.88]). No further differences were found. The probability rank indicated that pegvisomant and pasireotide have the highest probabilities (33% and 34%, respectively) of being the best therapeutic options. No major side effects were noted.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pegvisomant is still a good option for acromegaly treatment, but pasireotide seems to be a promising alternative. Nevertheless, other important key factors such as drug costs and effectiveness (real-world results) should be taken into account when selecting acromegaly treatment.

KEYWORDS:

acromegaly; meta-analysis; network meta-analysis; pasireotide; pegvisomant; pituitary gland

PMID:
30005760
DOI:
10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.014
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center