Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Nov;27(21-22):4192-4202. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14612. Epub 2018 Aug 1.

Walking on a tightrope-Caring for ambivalent women considering abortions in the first trimester.

Author information

1
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
2
Department of Health Sciences in Aalesund, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Aalesund, Norway.
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
4
Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
5
Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (HVL), Bergen, Norway.
6
Department of Plastic Surgery and Burn Center, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
7
Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:

To improve the understanding and competence of health personnel when caring for ambivalent pregnant women, the aim of this study was to explore the experiences of encountering women who are unsure whether to complete or terminate pregnancy.

BACKGROUND:

Feelings of ambivalence are present in a significant number of women preparing for abortions and may challenge the provision of health care. Health personnel have reported an ideal to be nonjudgemental and supportive. Insufficient attention has been directed to the experiences of health personnel who prepare women for abortions in gynaecological units.

DESIGN:

Qualitative design with a hermeneutic-phenomenological approach.

METHODS:

Focus group interviews were conducted with health personnel from four gynaecological outpatient clinics and wards in Norway (n = 20).

RESULTS:

The health personnel felt responsible for contributing to patient well-being. This demanded focused attention towards all women being prepared for abortions and meant a consciousness and balancing act towards revealing, handling and being involved in the woman's potential unsureness without influencing her decision. When involved, the health personnel risked being confronted with their own vulnerabilities and values.

CONCLUSIONS:

The health personnel tried to balance their care and support without influencing the woman's decision. Although they viewed the women as fully autonomous and responsible, they became personally involved, to varying degrees, in the uncertainty and were faced with their own vulnerabilities and values. They lacked a possibility for immediate debriefing and regular counselling after complicated consultations.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE:

Knowledge of the experiences of health personnel can provide input for professional development at gynaecological departments. These findings contribute to discussions about what information should be given and whether the woman's feelings should be discussed in preparation for an abortion. The ability of health personnel to discuss subjects related to ethically challenging encounters with women who are considering abortions should be established, namely, professional education and workshops at the national level and small groups with counselling and case study discussions at hospitals.

KEYWORDS:

caring; decision-making; focus groups; nurse practitioners; nurse-patient relationship; phenomenology; qualitative study; registered nurses; reproductive health; women's health

PMID:
29989231
DOI:
10.1111/jocn.14612
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center