Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Jul/Aug;29(7):648-655. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17044.

Impact of Hearing Loss and Amplification on Performance on a Cognitive Screening Test.

Author information

1
VA RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR.
2
Department Otolaryngology, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR.
3
Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

There have been numerous recent reports on the association between hearing impairment and cognitive function, such that the cognition of adults with hearing loss is poorer relative to the cognition of adults with normal hearing (NH), even when amplification is used. However, it is not clear the extent to which this is testing artifact due to the individual with hearing loss being unable to accurately hear the test stimuli.

PURPOSE:

The primary purpose of this study was to examine whether use of amplification during cognitive screening with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) improves performance on the MoCA. Secondarily, we investigated the effects of hearing ability on MoCA performance, by comparing the performance of individuals with and without hearing impairment.

STUDY SAMPLE:

Participants were 42 individuals with hearing impairment and 19 individuals with NH. Of the individuals with hearing impairment, 22 routinely used hearing aids; 20 did not use hearing aids.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:

Following a written informec consent process, all participants completed pure tone audiometry, speech testing in quiet (Maryland consonant-nucleus-consonant [CNC] words) and in noise (Quick Speech in Noise [QuickSIN] test), and the MoCA. The speech testing and MoCA were completed twice. Individuals with hearing impairment completed testing once unaided and once with amplification, whereas individuals with NH completed unaided testing twice.

RESULTS:

The individuals with hearing impairment performed significantly less well on the MoCA than those without hearing impairment for unaided testing, and the use of amplification did not significantly change performance. This is despite the finding that amplification significantly improved the performance of the hearing aid users on the measures of speech in quiet and speech in noise. Furthermore, there were strong correlations between MoCA score and the four frequency pure tone average, Maryland CNC score and QuickSIN, which remain moderate to strong when the analyses were adjusted for age.

CONCLUSIONS:

It is concluded that the individuals with hearing loss here performed less well on the MoCA than individuals with NH and that the use of amplification did not compensate for this performance deficit. Nonetheless, this should not be taken to suggest the use of amplification during testing is unnecessary because it might be that other unmeasured factors, such as effort required to perform or fatigue, were decreased with the use of amplification.

PMID:
29988012
DOI:
10.3766/jaaa.17044

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center