Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Front Oncol. 2018 Jun 21;8:228. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00228. eCollection 2018.

Machine Learning and Radiogenomics: Lessons Learned and Future Directions.

Author information

1
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
2
Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
3
Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
4
Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
5
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
6
Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon School of Computer Science, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
7
Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
8
Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
9
Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.

Abstract

Due to the rapid increase in the availability of patient data, there is significant interest in precision medicine that could facilitate the development of a personalized treatment plan for each patient on an individual basis. Radiation oncology is particularly suited for predictive machine learning (ML) models due to the enormous amount of diagnostic data used as input and therapeutic data generated as output. An emerging field in precision radiation oncology that can take advantage of ML approaches is radiogenomics, which is the study of the impact of genomic variations on the sensitivity of normal and tumor tissue to radiation. Currently, patients undergoing radiotherapy are treated using uniform dose constraints specific to the tumor and surrounding normal tissues. This is suboptimal in many ways. First, the dose that can be delivered to the target volume may be insufficient for control but is constrained by the surrounding normal tissue, as dose escalation can lead to significant morbidity and rare. Second, two patients with nearly identical dose distributions can have substantially different acute and late toxicities, resulting in lengthy treatment breaks and suboptimal control, or chronic morbidities leading to poor quality of life. Despite significant advances in radiogenomics, the magnitude of the genetic contribution to radiation response far exceeds our current understanding of individual risk variants. In the field of genomics, ML methods are being used to extract harder-to-detect knowledge, but these methods have yet to fully penetrate radiogenomics. Hence, the goal of this publication is to provide an overview of ML as it applies to radiogenomics. We begin with a brief history of radiogenomics and its relationship to precision medicine. We then introduce ML and compare it to statistical hypothesis testing to reflect on shared lessons and to avoid common pitfalls. Current ML approaches to genome-wide association studies are examined. The application of ML specifically to radiogenomics is next presented. We end with important lessons for the proper integration of ML into radiogenomics.

KEYWORDS:

big data; computational genomics; machine learning in radiation oncology; precision oncology; predictive modeling; radiation oncology; statistical genetics and genomics

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Frontiers Media SA Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center