Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Oct;86:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 26.

A scoping review of trials of interventions led or delivered by cancer nurses.

Author information

1
University of Technology, Cyprus and DOCENT; Department of Nursing Studies, University of Turku, Finland. Electronic address: andreas.charalambous@cut.ac.cy.
2
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: mary.wells5@nhs.net.
3
Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit (NMAHP RU), Glasgow Caledonian University, UK. Electronic address: pauline.campbell@gcu.ac.uk.
4
Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit (NMAHP RU), Glasgow Caledonian University, UK. Electronic address: Claire.Torrens@gcu.ac.uk.
5
Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Centre for Research & Development, Sweden. Electronic address: ulrika.ostlund@lnu.se.
6
Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: w.h.oldenmenger@erasmusmc.nl.
7
Nursing Faculty, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece. Electronic address: epatiraki@nurs.uoa.gr.
8
Regional Cancer Centre, Stockholm-Gotland, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Institute, Department of Learning Informatics, Management and Ethics, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: lena.sharp@sll.se.
9
Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: nohiveta@gmail.com.
10
Alicante University, Spain. Electronic address: nuria.domenech@ua.es.
11
Institute for Higher Education and Research in Healthcare and Nurse Research Consultant Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: manuela.eicher@chuv.ch.
12
Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK. Electronic address: carole.farrell@manchester.ac.uk.
13
Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Department of Health Sciences, Karlstad University, Sweden. Electronic address: maria.larsson@kau.se.
14
Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Department of Health Sciences, Karlstad University, Sweden. Electronic address: cecilia.olsson@kau.se.
15
NHS Lanarkshire, Scotland, UK. Electronic address: Mhairi.Simpson@lanarkshire.scot.nhs.uk.
16
Clinical Chair of Applied Health in Cancer Care, Strategic Lead for Health Service Research, The Royal Marsden, NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, UK. Electronic address: theresa.wiseman@rmh.nhs.uk.
17
Royal College of Nursing Chair of Nursing Research, Cardiff University, Wales, UK. Electronic address: KellyDM@cardiff.ac.uk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Advances in research and technology coupled with an increased cancer incidence and prevalence have resulted in significant expansion of cancer nurse role, in order to meet the growing demands and expectations of people affected by cancer (PABC). Cancer nurses are also tasked with delivering an increasing number of complex interventions as a result of ongoing clinical trials in cancer research. However much of this innovation is undocumented, and we have little insight about the nature of novel interventions currently being designed or delivered by cancer nurses.

OBJECTIVES:

To identify and synthesise the available evidence from clinical trials on interventions delivered or facilitated by cancer nurses.

DATA SOURCES AND REVIEW METHODS:

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCT), quasi-RCTs and controlled before and after studies (CBA) of cancer nursing interventions aimed at improving the experience and outcomes of PABC. Ten electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, Epistemonikos, CDSR, DARE, HTA, WHO ICTRP) were searched between 01 January 2000 and 31 May 2016. No language restrictions were applied. Bibliographies of selected studies and relevant Cochrane reviews were also hand-searched. Interventions delivered by cancer nurses were classified according to the OMAHA System. Heat maps were used to highlight the volume of evidence available for different cancer groups, intervention types and stage of cancer care continuum.

RESULTS:

The search identified 22,450 records; we screened 16,169 abstracts and considered 925 full papers, of which 214 studies (247,550 participants) were included in the evidence synthesis. The majority of studies were conducted in Europe (n = 79) and USA (n = 74). Interventions were delivered across the cancer continuum from prevention and risk reduction to survivorship, with the majority of interventions delivered during the treatment phase (n = 137). Most studies (131/214) had a teaching, guidance or counselling component. Cancer nurse interventions were targeted at primarily breast, prostate or multiple cancers. No studies were conducted in brain, sarcoma or other rare cancer types. The majority of the studies (n = 153) were nurse-led and delivered by specialist cancer nurses (n = 74) or advanced cancer nurses (n = 29), although the quality of reporting was poor.

CONCLUSIONS:

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review to synthesise evidence from intervention studies across the entire cancer spectrum. As such, this work provides new insights into the nature of the contribution that cancer nurses have made to evidence-based innovations, as well as highlighting areas in which cancer nursing trials can be developed in the future.

KEYWORDS:

Cancer care; Clinical trials; Interventions; Nursing

PMID:
29960894
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.05.014
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center