Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):1061-1065. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2532-9. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

Anesthetic efficacy of an inferior alveolar nerve block in soft tissue and correlation between soft tissue and pulpal anesthesia.

Author information

1
Department of Conservative Dentistry, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
2
Microscope Center, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
3
Department of Oral Medicine, TMJ and Orofacial Pain Clinic, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
4
Division in Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Department of Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
5
Microscope Center, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea. juen@yuhs.ac.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

This study was aimed at evaluating the anesthetic success rates in various regions of soft tissue after inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block and comparing the success rates of soft tissue anesthesia with those of pulpal anesthesia to find correlations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Fifty-nine dental students received an IAN block injection. A total of four test sites were used for soft tissue anesthesia using a pressure algometer (PA): the corner of the lower lip vermilion border (LL); the buccal-attached gingiva of the lateral incisor (BGI), the molar (BGM), and the lingual gingiva (LG). The lateral incisor (LI) and the first molar (M1) were evaluated for pulpal anesthesia using an electric pulp tester. To evaluate whether soft tissue anesthesia can be an indicator of pulpal anesthesia, the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

RESULTS:

The highest success rate for soft tissue anesthesia was seen on the LG (93.9%), followed by LL (79.6%), BGI (53.1%), and BGM (14.3%). The PPVs of LL for the M1 and Ll were 74.4 and 59.0%. The NPVs for the M1 and LI were much higher in the LL (90.0 and 100%, respectively) than in the BGI (56.5 and 69.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

The highest success rate was found in the LG. Lip numbness was not an indicator of pulpal anesthesia of M1 and LI. However, if the LL was not anesthetized, the probabilities of failed pulpal anesthesia were very high in the LI and M1.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE:

The clinicians need to consider not doing an additional lingual nerve block after IAN block.

KEYWORDS:

Inferior alveolar nerve block; Predictive value; Pressure algometer; Soft tissue anesthesia

PMID:
29943368
DOI:
10.1007/s00784-018-2532-9

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center