Send to

Choose Destination
Pain. 2018 Sep;159(9):1790-1801. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001276.

Efficacy of hypnosis on pain, wound-healing, anxiety, and stress in children with acute burn injuries: a randomized controlled trial.

Author information

Center for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, Level 7, Children's Health Research Center, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
The Pegg Leditschke Children's Burns Center, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Level 5, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ochsner Clinical School, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA, United States.
Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
UQ Child Health Research Center, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, School of Biomedical Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.


No randomized controlled trial has investigated the efficacy of hypnosis for reducing pain and improving wound-healing in children with burns. This randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate whether hypnosis decreases pain, anxiety, and stress and accelerates wound-healing in children undergoing burn wound procedures. Children (4-16 years) with acute burns presenting for their first dressing change were randomly assigned to a Hypnosis Group who received hypnosis plus standard care or a Standard Care Group who received standard pharmacological and nonpharmacological intervention. Repeated measures of pain intensity, anxiety, stress, and wound-healing were taken at dressing changes until ≥95% wound re-epithelialization. Data for 62 children were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis using Generalized Estimating Equations (n = 35 Standard Care Group; n = 27 Hypnosis Group). An effect on the primary outcomes of pain and wound healing was not supported {self-reported pain intensity largest Mean Difference [MD] = -0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.91 to 0.22), P = 0.12; MD for re-epithelialization = -0.46 [95% CI: -4.27 to 3.35], P = 0.81}. Some support was found for an effect on the secondary outcomes of preprocedural anxiety (MD = -0.80 [95% CI: -1.50 to -0.10], P = 0.03 before the second dressing change) and heart rate as a measure of stress (MD = -15.20 [-27.20 to -3.20], P = 0.01 and MD = -15.39 [-28.25 to -2.53], P = 0.02 before and after the third dressing change). Hypnosis may be effective for decreasing preprocedural anxiety and heart rate in children undergoing repeated pediatric wound care procedures but not for reducing pain intensity or accelerating wound healing.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center