Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 1;179:403-413. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.053. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

Establishing the functional connectivity of the frontotemporal network in pre-attentive change detection with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and event-related optical signal.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Center for Cognition and Brain Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. Electronic address: cytse@psy.cuhk.edu.hk.
2
Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Center for Cognition and Brain Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
3
Department of Imaging & Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
4
Department of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
5
Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
6
Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Current theories of pre-attentive deviant detection postulate that before the Superior Temporal Cortex (STC) detects a change, the Inferior Frontal Cortex (IFC) engages in stimulus analysis, which is particularly critical for ambiguous deviations (e.g., deviant preceded by a short train of standards). These theories rest on the assumption that IFC and STC are functionally connected, which has only been supported by correlational brain imaging studies. We examined this functional connectivity assumption by applying Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to disrupt IFC function, while measuring the later STC mismatch response with the event-related optical signal (EROS). EROS can localize brain activity in both spatial and temporal dimensions via measurement of optical property changes associated with neuronal activity, and is inert to the electromagnetic interference produced by TMS. Specifically, the STC mismatch response at 120-180 ms elicited by a deviant preceded by a short standard train when IFC TMS was applied at 80 ms was compared with the STC mismatch responses in temporal control (TMS with 200 ms delay), spatial control (sham TMS at vertex), auditory control (TMS pulse noise only), and cognitive control (deviant preceded by a long standard train) conditions. The STC mismatch response to deviants preceded by the short train was abolished by TMS of the IFC at 80 ms, while the STC responses remained intact in all other control conditions. These results confirm the involvement of the IFC in the STC mismatch response and support a functional connection between IFC and STC.

KEYWORDS:

Change detection; EROS; Frontotemporal network; Functional connectivity; MMN; TMS

Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center